Highly recommended

“Martha was sentenced to lifetime imprisonment in Ireland. “If she wasn’t Polish, she would be free”” – article on wp.pl (in Polish language)

“Mum of Polish woman sentenced to lifetime imprisonment in Ireland: I’m not afraid that someone call me “mother of a murderer”. I know it wasn’t murder” – article on wp.pl

Mama Polki skazanej na dożywocie w Irlandii: nie boję się, że ktoś powie o mnie “matka morderczyni”

Source: kobieta.wp.pl/mama-polki-skazanej-na-dozywocie-w-irlandii-nie-boje-sie-ze-ktos-powie-o-mnie-matka-morderczyni-6210109626099841a

Share:
Highly recommended

I want to help – financially

The amount of gathered financial resources for helping Martha is updated daily.

We thank very much for financial support.

Providing effective and professional help for Martha, one we would like to provide, both in Ireland as in Strasburg, involves great financial costs.

All the time, Martha’s family and friends, bear every financial cost themselves.
They do as much as they can, and as much as financial resources allow them to.

We were resisting against fundraising and we do not have any experience in this. We don’t want to impose ouorself with fundraising.
But we are also convinced, that creating a specal fund will have a positive influence on the quality and effectiveness of helping Martha.

Gathered resources we would like to use for professional solicitor (now it is still public solicitor), special psychological and language opinions, translations, possible media activities or other actions necessary for providing effective help for Martha.

Martha’s family lives in Poland, but isn’t raising money for their monthly flights and stays in Ireland.
They visit Ireland only to support Martha, but they treat this as their family duty, and a pleasure of contacting with Martha, and they don’t raise any funds for this purpose.

Currently gathered resources
Fundacja ALFA
ul. Zeusa 47/29
01-497 Warszawa

SWIFT: ALBPPLPW
PLN: 67 2490 0005 0000 4600 1934 9071110 PLN
EUR: 14 2490 0005 0000 4600 5400 5603120 EUR
USD: 49 2490 0005 0000 4600 2320 86370 USD

For now no amount was spent from gathered money.

We thank very much to every benevolent people for all of their help.

Share:
Highly recommended

Contacts

Marta Herda Dóchas Centre
North Circular Road
Dublin 7
Ireland
Monika Łyżwa
Martha’s sister, procurator
monika@helpformartha.org
Rodzina Marty contact@helpformartha.org
Mary O’Connor
Prison governor
Dóchas Centre
North Circular Road
Dublin 7
Ireland
Patrick McCarthy
Judge leading the case
First jury
7 women and 5 men
Chairman of first jury
woman, she did not confess she was an employee of An Garda Síochána
Second jury
8 men and 4 women
Chairman of second jury
man
George Birmingham
Alan Mahon
Maire Whelan
Judges of Court of Appeal
Helena Kiely Head of prosecutor’s office
Brendan Grehan SC
(Junior Counsel 1989, Senior Counsel 2003)
Prosecutor
Paul Murray SC
(Junior Counsel 1985, Senior Counsel 2017)
Prosecutor
Thomas E Honan Martha’s solicitor
Michael Liam O’Higgins SC
(Junior Counsel 1987, Senior Counsel 2000)
Barrister only for the first day
Giollaiosa Ó Lideadha SC
(Junior Counsel 1989, Senior Counsel 2006)
Barrister
Niamh Foley BL
(Junior Counsel 2006)
Barrister

 

Share:
Highly recommended

“She drove into ice-cold water, a man died. Polish woman sentenced to lifetime imprisonment in Ireland” – reportage of Superwizjer (in Polish language)

She drove into ice-cold water, a man died. Polish woman sentenced to lifetime imprisonment in Ireland

Source: www.tvn24.pl/superwizjer-polka-skazana-na-dozywocie,805994,s.html

Share:
Highly recommended

How it was possible to not take fingerprints from Martha’s car?

Prosecutor, during the trial in court, said that Martha used the car as a “murder weapon”.

It’s probably the first case in history of European forensics, that nobody has taken fingerprints from the “murder weapon”.

Sticking to the terminology of the prosecutor:
Due to the lack of fingerprints taken from the car – the prosecutor doesn’t even knows who held this alleged “murder weapon”, who pulled the symbolic “trigger”.

Stating, that Martha’s car was used as a “murder weapon” is far from truth.

Why prosecutor’s statement, that Martha’s car was used as a “murder weapon” can’t be true?

Which argument convinces you? Select and vote (you can select more than one answer or provide your own).

Or maybe Garda’s actions were correct?
Fingerprints were not taken from the car, only water samples were taken: both from the river (site of accident) and from the sea (place where Csaba’s body was found).

The cause of Csaba’s death was not car but… water.

Share:
Highly recommended

Not taking of fingerprints from Martha’s car

No fingerprints were taken from Martha’s car – Volkswagen Passat.

No fingerprints were taken from:

  • driver’s door handle
  • passenger’s door handle
  • driving wheel
  • dashboard
  • hand-brake
  • driver’s window opening button
  • driver’s seat belt release button
  • additionally, passenger’s window opening button
  • additionally, passenger’s seat belt release button
Why no fingerprints were taken and no specialist test were carried out? Select and vote (You can select multiple answers or add your own)
Share:
Highly recommended

Destroyed recordings from two cameras

There are cameras placed on the building of the Lifeboat House in Arklow, standing near the crossroad.

Two of these cameras on 6:00am recorded running Martha.
Martha stops at the wicket, leans against it, she staggers on her legs, squats down.
Then, with her hands raised she runs on.

The same two cameras recorded, 10 minutes earlier, the ride of Martha’s car with her and Csaba.

Recordings from two cameras from 6:00am – preserved.
Recordings from the same two cameras from 5:50am – 10 minutes earlier – are gone.

What happened?
A Lifeboat House employee reviews all recordings only one week after the accident, makes notes and downloads recordings from two cameras from 6:00 am.
After few more days, he gets back to download the recordings of car driving – at 5:50am – but the recordings are deleted from the monitoring system.

What could be seen on those recordings?
(Both cameras were recording from the car passenger side)

  1. The velocity of the car.
  2. In what posiotion was the passenger of the car – Csaba.
  3. Is the passenger (Csaba) not obscuring the direction of travel and the field of view, to the driver (Martha).
  4. Was the passenger (Csaba) behaviour deviates from normal behaviour.

Those recording were especially important because of:

  • proximity of the accident site
  • catching the moment, when Martha decided not to go to the beach, and turns into the road, on which end she intended to turn the car around
  • the intensity of emotions and agression of the passenger, who realized that Martha surely won’t go to the beach, and really makes a turn to get back and drive him home.

Was the destruction of those recordings, from two cameras from a specific hour, a coincidence?

What does this say? Select and vote

Or maybe the recordings have been preserved, but have not been made available?

Why did not “the defence” call as a witness a person, who reviewed the recordings before their destruction, and knows what was on the recordings?

Share:
Highly recommended

Lack of recordings from CCTV cameras on Martha and Csaba’s route

There are at least several industrial cameras, on the route which Martha and Csaba drove.

GARDA was concentrating on Martha driving through the center of Arklow, where she was driving alone. Recordings from at least two of the cameras were gathered.
No recording  from the route of Martha driving with Csaba did preserve (or recording wasn’t disclosed).

What would be seen on those recordings?

  1. The velocity of the car.
  2. In what posiotion was the passenger of the car – Csaba.
  3. Is the passenger (Csaba) not obscuring the direction of travel and the field of view, to the driver (Martha).
  4. Was the passenger (Csaba) behaviour deviates from normal behaviour.
  5. Was the driver window open, in the car during the ride.

Is the lack of recordings from CCTV cameras a coincidence?

What does this say? Select and vote.

Or maybe some recordings preserved?

 

Share:
Highly recommended

Lack of content of SMSes from Csaba

Aside from making phonecalls to Martha, Csaba used to write a lot of SMS to Martha, at different hours

SMS only from Csaba from just 2 days:

24th march 2013 – 2:14 am
24th march 2013 – 2:34 am
24th march 2013 – 2:34 am
24th march 2013 – 2:37 am
24th march 2013 – 3:31 pm

25th march 2013 – 0:06 am
25th march 2013 – 0:09 am
25th march 2013 – 10:38 am
25th march 2013 – 4:58 pm

Martha’s phonecalls to Csaba were frequently an answer to those SMS.

Csaba, desperate, rejected boy, wrote everything in those messages:
from love confessions to vulgar invectives.

Content of Csaba’s SMS could have been downloaded from Martha’s phone or Csaba’s phone.

It wasn’t downloaded from any of the phones.

Why?

What does this say? Select and vote.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Or maybe they were downloaded but not disclosed?

Share: