Highly recommended

Summary of 2018 – a failure, a success, an unknown

We could write a lot about 2018.

We will limit to 3 categories:

1. Failure
The main failure is that Martha is still in prison.
Engagement of many people, next TV program, few press articles, websites, didn’t make any important change.
Are we anywhere further?
Rather we’ve lost time, health, and more…

2. Success
In the success category we put two situations:

First:
Th…, s… – how to say this politely – la…, let’s use the word: parting with Martha’s former attorney.
The attorney pointed by accusing GARDA.
GARDA, who came to such brilliant conclusions. Criminal Fantasy. Parody, Caricature, Farce, Grotesque  or Drama, or rather Tragedy with elements of Absurd.
Irish “classics”.
We finally managed to part with the attorney effectively only on May 20, 2018.
Way, way to late.
Martha assessed, that it would be better if she defended herself only with family and friends.
In was an extremely and exceptionally effective attorney only in one matter – keeping Martha from changing him.
We don’t understand this.
If you can’t cope, you can’t do it, why do you want to be there at all cost?
In some countries, first instance attorney wouldn’t be able to lead the case in next instances.
If Martha needed an “assurer” that it will be all right, we would hire some good motivational speaker or a psychologist, not an attorney.
But Martha’s former attorney did everything well and he doesn’t understand why this happened.

Second:
It seems that finally Martha, and her family had grown to appropriate actions.
Naive faith in honesty and justice in Ireland have ended.

3. Unknown
Unexpectedly, current Martha’s attorney has been promoted to this category.
After all our peanyas and admiration, a screeching reality comes out.
All may still be good. Maybe…
Although now it will be very, very hard…
Time will tell…
Will current attorney show exceptional engagement and exceptional effectiveness?
After 2019 will we say that this was a SUCCESS or a FAILURE?
Will the words of one of the people confirm that “In Ireland, you can not trust ANY lawyer”?

Unfortunately we are one of the people happy that 2018 finally ended.
We’re smarter this year.
Painfully smarter.

But are we smart enough, determined enough to lead to positive ending in 2019?

Highly recommended

Visit of the solicitor, Frank Gearty – Martha signs an application to ECHR

On Saturday, November 10, Martha was visited by her attorney, Frank Gearty.
The main goal of the visit was discussing the issues related with submitting the application to European Court of Human Rights.
Martha got acquainted with prepared application.
Martha, just as her family, agree with the application prepared by an attorney Frank Gearty.

This is probably the first document in Martha’s case that is “on the topic”.
Specific and factual.
Arguments used are convincing even for people not knowing anything about the law.
Because every human knows and understands what rights he or she has.
And feels when his or her rights, HUMAN RIGTS, were violated.

We thank to the attorney Frank Gearty for his very good work.

Martha signed the application to European Court of Human Rights.

She didn’t want to leave a copy of the document for her in prison.

First meeting of Martha with the new attorney

On Saturday, May 26, new attorney of Martha – Frank Gearty – had visited her in prison.
It was the first meeting of new attorney with Martha.
The meeting lasted for two hours.
Martha was very pleased with the meeting.
As for actions in Ireland, Martha has a reasonable attitude.
She trusts the new attorney, that he will do everything possible to do in Ireland.

Frank Gearty is taking over of Martha’s case in a difficult moment.
On May 21, the Supreme Court made an unfavorable decision.

Is there any chance for fixing those unfair decisions?
Wasn’t the change too late?

The attorney gets acquainted with the case.
Maybe not everything is lost yet…

Martha finally has HER lawyer! – Thank you Frank Gearty for willing to take Martha’s case.

On May 14, during the talk of the family with Martha, decision about changing the lawyer was made.
It was known for a long time, that the attorney must be change.
The search for the right person continued all the time.
Previous barrister was appointed by GARDA from Arklow.
GARDA from Arklow, meaning the main accusers of Martha, and creators of absurd theories about Martha the stuntwoman and the murderer.
But Irish courts believed in those fantasies, and in almost supernatural abilities of Martha.
In the opinion of the family, Martha’s lawyer didn’t disturb them very much, and maybe, sometimes helped them with his decisions.

There was a situation once, that Martha changed her lawyer.
That time, instead of passing the documents, previous lawyer led to withdrawal of the appointed law firm from the case.

Martha’s case is difficult.
Especially on this stage it requires remarkable attorney.
An attorney, who will not fear of negative reception of Martha in massmedia, in the society, and even between Irish judges.
An attorney who will reveal all of gross deficiencies in Martha’s case.
Deficiencies that Ireland wants to hide so carefully, and lead to that no one else will be interested in Martha’s case.

Now a GREAT MAN and VERY GOOD LAWYER was chosen.
We’re very happy, that Frank Gearty was willing to take Martha’s case.

Dochas Centre prison tried to prevent (?!) Martha from changing the attorney. It wanted to censor, if Martha can sign (?!) the documents about changing the attorney.
Ultimately, despite the difficulties from the prison, such a change finally occured.
May 20, 2018 may be considered as a date of changing of the attorney.

Will this be one of the breakthroughs in the case?
Will other honest Irish people want to help Martha?
Is the change not too late?…

Why Martha’s rights to secrecy of correspondence with the attorney, are violated in Dochas Centre prison in Dublin?

Ireland agreed to respect European Prison Rules.

According to those rules, Martha’s correspondance TO AND FROM HER LAWYER CAN NOT BE SUPERVISED.
It can not be opened.
Opening of letters may take place only in the presence of Martha.
Opening in Martha’s presence is only meant to make sure, that correspondence from a lawyer is indeed included in a letter described externally as correspondence from a lawyer.

That’s the law…
And the reality in Dochas Centre Prison in Dublin?
During her entire prison stay (almost 2 years), Martha receives all her letters opened, including those from her attorney.

Why Dochas Centre prison in Dublin, for almost 2 years violates Martha’s rights to secrecy of correspondance with an attorney?
Could anything regarding Martha, on any stage, in Ireland, happen lawfully?
Is respecting human, prisoner or or foreigner rights… too difficult for this country?

Or maybe another questions:
Is Ireland rulend onlby by Omnipotent Euro and Enormous Selfishness?
Are any rights respected in Ireland?

After our experience, we can answer the question: “Are any rights respected in Ireland?“, this way:… IT MAY HAPPEN

The visit of the public defender – Martha receives important translation of nurse’s testimony

On Thursday Martha was visited by her public defender.
He personally delivered what Martha asked for  a few months ago: a translation of nurse Claire Best testimony.
Martha asked for this in her telephone call few months ago
She didn’t receive anything.
She asked for this officialy, via letter – on March 5, 2018 (Letter nr 3).
(The help and cooperation of public defender is so well, that every request Martha sends on writing: a numbered letter to the attorney and identical letter to her sister).
In the letter to the defender she asked for delivering it in 7 days.
Instead of delivering it on time, the attorney sent Martha a letter, asking why she wants this in 7 days?
He delivered it on Thursday – May 3, 2018.
Not after 7 days – but after… few months since the first request and 2 months after the written request.
(In her letter dated March 5, 2018, Martha requested dwo more information, which she didn’t receive, and she’s still waiting).

The public attorney informed Martha, that the decision of the Supreme Court can be made any moment now.
And the latest?
In the latest it can be made until end of June or end of July, 2018.

What happened that Martha’s attorney came down personally?
Is this connected to the violations of rights and correspondance of Martha in Dochas Centre prison in Dublin?