Highly recommended

How it was possible to not take fingerprints from Martha’s car?

Prosecutor, during the trial in court, said that Martha used the car as a “murder weapon”.

It’s probably the first case in history of European forensics, that nobody has taken fingerprints from the “murder weapon”.

Sticking to the terminology of the prosecutor:
Due to the lack of fingerprints taken from the car – the prosecutor doesn’t even knows who held this alleged “murder weapon”, who pulled the symbolic “trigger”.

Stating, that Martha’s car was used as a “murder weapon” is far from truth.

Why prosecutor’s statement, that Martha’s car was used as a “murder weapon” can’t be true?

Which argument convinces you? Select and vote (you can select more than one answer or provide your own).
3 votes · 0 answers
vote

Or maybe Garda’s actions were correct?
Fingerprints were not taken from the car, only water samples were taken: both from the river (site of accident) and from the sea (place where Csaba’s body was found).

The cause of Csaba’s death was not car but… water.

Share:

How much Prosecution Barrister in Martha’s case earned.

One of the country’s best known prosecution and defence counsel, Brendan Grehan SC last year €92,997 from the DPP – Mr Grehan last year successfully prosecuted waitress Marta Herda (29) for the pier crash murder of Hungarian, Csaba Orsos.

 

Source: http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/irelands-top-prosecutors-earned-148million-10021731

Share: