- Not collecting the contents of text messages from Csaba
- Not collecting the list of phone calls and text messages from a longer period – a week or two – only 3 last days list was collected
- Suggesting Martha’s secret phone – Martha used two phones equally
- Lack of recordings from CCTV cameras on the route of Martha’s and Csaba’s ride together
- Destroying of the recordings from two CCTV cameras – not interrogating the person, who saw those recordings before destruction.
- Late arrival of the car accident expert – too late analysis of the braking marks
- Not establishing the velocity with which car broke through the barriers
- Not establishing if the quality of the barriers was adequate and if it was sufficient security – after the accident barriers were change for more solid.
- Not establishing WHO braked and with WHAT
- Not establishing if ABS in the car worked, if it was damaged in the moment of car hitting the electrical box
- Not collecting any fingerprints from the car
- Not establishing who opened the car window – not collecting the fingerprints from the window opening button
- Not carrying out an on-site verification with Martha – not establishing when Martha smoked a cigarette and opened the window, and when she closed it
- Not establishing if hand brake was used – not collecting the fingerprints from hand-brake, not interrogating the divers about what was the hand-brake position in the sunk car
- Not collecting the fingerprints from cockpit – not establishing of the behavior of passanger in the car
- Not examining of Csaba for the impact of taking steroids and products aiding the muscle growth on the rise of emotional arousal
- Lack of any kind of establishing of the impact of Csaba’s behavior, on causing the accident
- Not establishing that it was implausible that Csaba, as a waiter and a worker on few passenger ferries could not swim
- Spreading the untruth, that Csaba could not swim, and had a panic fear of water
- Lack of establishing of Martha’s mental condition in the moment of the accident
- Not examining Martha on the presence of alcohol in blood
- Forcing first interrogation right after the accident: or she will testify and can go home later, or she will be locked (not informing Martha, that she could be locked only for 24 hours)
- Lack of the translator – in the hospital and at the first interrogation
- First interrogation of Martha without the presence of a doctor
- Lack of attorney during the first interrogation of Martha
- Not recording of first interrogation of Martha
- Arresting and interrogating Martha – 12 hours – alternately screaming and treating with cigarette
- Passive participation of the translator during a recorded interrogation – doesn’t translate everything to Martha, only suggests her, when she misses a word
- Calling Martha lawyer by Garda in the evening, to convince Martha to consent on prolonging the interrogation – pushing the interrogated, overtired, hungry Martha
- Suggesting that Martha lied in the first testimony – words of Mariusz about where Csaba could get in Martha’s car were taken as Martha’s words
- Not examining Martha with polygraph – Martha expressed such wish
- Violating the Presumption of innocence rule – free using of every detail against Martha, without any evidence
- Unexpected adding the testimony of a nurse after three years from the accindent, and adding her incredibly thorough notes (from the same town as investigators)
- Incredibly thorough notes of the nurse – more about Martha and Csaba than about Martha’s health condition, very precise time of Martha calling the phone
- Incredibly thorough notes of the nurse – the nurse at the hospital interrogates Victor first, earlier and more thoroughly than Garda
- Media campaing and issuing the verdict in Irish media before the trial
- First chairman of the jury hides the fact, that she is a retired Garda officer
- Wrong advice from the lawyer, that Martha would not testify
- Wrong advice from the lawyer, that Martha would not show emotions, would not grimace and cry
- Wrong advice from the attorney, that Martha and her family would not talk to any media
- Biased course of the trial at the Court – the Judge doesn’t take defence proposals into account
- Biased relations of the course of the trial by Irish media – lack of interest and getting out during defence speaking
- Not informing the jury by the Judge about all possibilities regarding making the decision
- Not informing the jury by the judge, that the jury didn’t have to make a decision in the case of doubts
- The jury makes the decision in last possible hours