Highly recommended

The story of drama of Martha Herda- Lesław Obłój on zdjęcia.ovh (in Polish language)

Marta Herda – help – freedom

Tragic story of Martha Herda. A call for help in freeing her from prison, where she is serving lifetime imprisonment sentence for a crime she didn’t commit.

The story of drama of Martha Herda – a Polish woman serving a lifetime imprisonment sentence. Wrongly, because everything indicates that she didn’t commit the crime she was sentenced for. I have expressed my view on the case in this article, which is also a call for help for Martha.

Source: https://zdjecia.ovh/pomoc-dla-marty-herdy.html

Highly recommended

Summary of 2018 – a failure, a success, an unknown

We could write a lot about 2018.

We will limit to 3 categories:

1. Failure
The main failure is that Martha is still in prison.
Engagement of many people, next TV program, few press articles, websites, didn’t make any important change.
Are we anywhere further?
Rather we’ve lost time, health, and more…

2. Success
In the success category we put two situations:

Th…, s… – how to say this politely – la…, let’s use the word: parting with Martha’s former attorney.
The attorney pointed by accusing GARDA.
GARDA, who came to such brilliant conclusions. Criminal Fantasy. Parody, Caricature, Farce, Grotesque  or Drama, or rather Tragedy with elements of Absurd.
Irish “classics”.
We finally managed to part with the attorney effectively only on May 20, 2018.
Way, way to late.
Martha assessed, that it would be better if she defended herself only with family and friends.
In was an extremely and exceptionally effective attorney only in one matter – keeping Martha from changing him.
We don’t understand this.
If you can’t cope, you can’t do it, why do you want to be there at all cost?
In some countries, first instance attorney wouldn’t be able to lead the case in next instances.
If Martha needed an “assurer” that it will be all right, we would hire some good motivational speaker or a psychologist, not an attorney.
But Martha’s former attorney did everything well and he doesn’t understand why this happened.

It seems that finally Martha, and her family had grown to appropriate actions.
Naive faith in honesty and justice in Ireland have ended.

3. Unknown
Unexpectedly, current Martha’s attorney has been promoted to this category.
After all our peanyas and admiration, a screeching reality comes out.
All may still be good. Maybe…
Although now it will be very, very hard…
Time will tell…
Will current attorney show exceptional engagement and exceptional effectiveness?
After 2019 will we say that this was a SUCCESS or a FAILURE?
Will the words of one of the people confirm that “In Ireland, you can not trust ANY lawyer”?

Unfortunately we are one of the people happy that 2018 finally ended.
We’re smarter this year.
Painfully smarter.

But are we smart enough, determined enough to lead to positive ending in 2019?

Highly recommended

Do you want to get another chance in life? In 2019? – What will you do then?

How often we would want to repeat something?
Maybe the second time we would act better, more mature, definitely different.

However most of the time we don’t get the second chance.
It’s HERE and NOW.
Nothing in life will happen again.
“The train is gone”.
If we had some chance, it just gone away now, and we’re late.
There’s no use in blaming yourself AFTER.

But there are situations…
Very rarely…
That something can be fixed…
It won’t be the same…

Can remorse be calmed?
…That we didn’t do everything, when there was proper time…
…That we lacked something… maybe courage…
…Maybe we wanted to stick to the sidelines…
…Maybe we counted for the case to end without our participation…
…Maybe we don’t have only clean pages in our life and we fear, that someone will suddenly get them out…

What will you do when you get the second chance?
How will you act?
Will the second time be the same?


Next “train” will go for the same destination.
Will you get on board this time?
Give us a sign if you want a “ticket”.

“If someone really wants to help – will find a way.
If someone doesn’t want to help – will always find an excuse”

What will you choose?
Will you help Martha NOW?

Highly recommended

“‘truth will come out’ Family of murderer Marta Herda launch appeal to European court as they claim new evidence will prove victim could ‘swim very well’” – The Irish Sun

Family of murderer Marta Herda launch appeal to European court with new evidence

Family of murderer Marta Herda launch appeal to European court with new evidence

A WOMAN jailed for life for murdering her infatuated colleague has launched an appeal to the European Courts of Human Rights in Strasbourg as she maintains her innocence.

Source: www.thesun.ie/news/3495983/family-marta-herda-appeal-european-court/

Highly recommended

Case for the Reporter (in Polish language) – November 29, 2018

Sprawa dla reportera – 29.11.2018

Sprawa dla reportera – 29.11.2018

1) Marta wyjechała do Irlandii w poszukiwaniu lepszego życia. Tam poznała mężczyznę. W 2016 r. doszło do wypadku. Kobieta jadąc ze znajomym wpadła rozpędzonym samochodem do rzeki. Ona przeżyła, mężczyzna utonął. Sąd skazał ją na dożywocie za morderstwo twierdząc, że wjeżdżając do wody zrobiła to z premedytacją. Rodzina nie zgadza się z wyrokiem sądu.

Source: https://vod.tvp.pl/video/sprawa-dla-reportera,29112018,39869763


Highly recommended
I want to help

“Without silver”… – “Martha’s behind bars” (or “Pole behind bars”) – why we raise funds?

‘Without “silver”… – Martha’s behind bars’ – this paraphrase of a quote of one of polish comedy groups, fits Martha’s current situation perfectly.

Ireland wants to forget about Martha already.
Martha is also no longer entitled to public defender – on Legal Aid.
And Irish GARDA wants to destroy and cover all the tracks.

Martha’s family is still fighting for justice and freedom for Martha.
On this level, legal battles are very expensive.
The family manages funds very sparingly.

1. The case was submitted to European Court of Human Rights
The application will probably have to be supplemented with expensive expert opinions.
If ECHR wants to look into Martha’s case, only then Martha will be entitled to lawyer reimbursment.

2. Martha’s case is being prepared for re-submitting in Ireland.
Elaboration about NEW FACTS in Martha’s case is being prepared.
NEW, not presented until now.
Two or three expensive expert opinions are necessary (at least two).

3. Underway is a search of Polish law firm, that would take care of Martha’s case, and her possible deportation to Poland.

All these 3 actions demand very large financial costs.

We don’t spend money senseless.



Fundacja ALFA
ul. Zeusa 47/29
01-497 WarszawaSWIFT: ALBPPLPWPLN:
67 2490 0005 0000 4600 1934 9071
14 2490 0005 0000 4600 5400 5603

49 2490 0005 0000 4600 2320 8637

Highly recommended

Abnormalities in Martha’s case

  1. Not collecting the contents of text messages from Csaba
  2. Not collecting the list of phone calls and text messages from a longer period – a week or two – only 3 last days list was collected
  3. Suggesting Martha’s secret phone – Martha used two phones equally
  4. Lack of recordings from CCTV cameras on the route of Martha’s and Csaba’s ride together
  5. Destroying of the recordings from two CCTV cameras – not interrogating the person, who saw those recordings before destruction.
  6. Late arrival of the car accident expert – too late analysis of the braking marks
  7. Not establishing the velocity with which car broke through the barriers
  8. Not establishing if the quality of the barriers was adequate and if it was sufficient security – after the accident barriers were change for more solid.
  9. Not establishing WHO braked and with WHAT
  10. Not establishing if ABS in the car worked, if it was damaged in the moment of car hitting the electrical box
  11. Not collecting any fingerprints from the car
  12. Not establishing who opened the car window – not collecting the fingerprints from the window opening button
  13. Not carrying out an on-site verification with Martha – not establishing when Martha smoked a cigarette and opened the window, and when she closed it
  14. Not establishing if hand brake was used – not collecting the fingerprints from hand-brake, not interrogating the divers about what was the hand-brake position in the sunk car
  15. Not collecting the fingerprints from cockpit – not establishing of the behavior of passanger in the car
  16. Not examining of Csaba for the impact of taking steroids and products aiding the muscle growth on the rise of emotional arousal
  17. Lack of any kind of establishing of the impact of Csaba’s behavior, on causing the accident
  18. Not establishing that it was implausible that Csaba, as a waiter and a worker on few passenger ferries could not swim
  19. Spreading the untruth, that Csaba could not swim, and had a panic fear of water
  20. Lack of establishing of Martha’s mental condition in the moment of the accident
  21. Not examining Martha on the presence of alcohol in blood
  22. Forcing first interrogation right after the accident: or she will testify and can go home later, or she will be locked (not informing Martha, that she could be locked only for 24 hours)
  23. Lack of the translator – in the hospital and at the first interrogation
  24. First interrogation of Martha without the presence of a doctor
  25. Lack of attorney during the first interrogation of Martha
  26. Not recording of first interrogation of Martha
  27. Arresting and interrogating Martha – 12 hours – alternately screaming and treating with cigarette
  28. Passive participation of the translator during a recorded interrogation – doesn’t translate everything to Martha, only suggests her, when she misses a word
  29. Calling Martha lawyer by Garda in the evening, to convince Martha to consent on prolonging the interrogation – pushing the interrogated, overtired, hungry Martha
  30. Suggesting that Martha lied in the first testimony – words of Mariusz about where Csaba could get in Martha’s car were taken as Martha’s words
  31. Not examining Martha with polygraph – Martha expressed such wish
  32. Violating the Presumption of innocence rule – free using of every detail against Martha, without any evidence
  33. Unexpected adding the testimony of a nurse after three years from the accindent, and adding her incredibly thorough notes (from the same town as investigators)
  34. Incredibly thorough notes of the nurse – more about Martha and Csaba than about Martha’s health condition, very precise time of Martha calling the phone
  35. Incredibly thorough notes of the nurse – the nurse at the hospital interrogates Victor first, earlier and more thoroughly than Garda
  36. Media campaing and issuing the verdict in Irish media before the trial
  37. First chairman of the jury hides the fact, that she is a retired Garda officer
  38. Wrong advice from the lawyer, that Martha would not testify
  39. Wrong advice from the lawyer, that Martha would not show emotions, would not grimace and cry
  40. Wrong advice from the attorney, that Martha and her family would not talk to any media
  41. Biased course of the trial at the Court – the Judge doesn’t take defence proposals into account
  42. Biased relations of the course of the trial by Irish media – lack of interest and getting out during defence speaking
  43. Not informing the jury by the Judge about all possibilities regarding making the decision
  44. Not informing the jury by the judge, that the jury didn’t have to make a decision in the case of doubts
  45. The jury makes the decision in last possible hours
Highly recommended

Why some important details and abnormalities in Martha’s case are still missing on websites?

There are few reasons and they are equally important:
1. Because there are too few of us.
2. Because we don’t have enough time for everything.
3. Because websites are a support for CURRENTLY needed legal actions regarding Martha’s defense.

The websites were created late, way too late.
And in fact, they were created “just in case”.
While entering a plane to Ireland, a decision was made to create the websites.
On October 11, 2017, a day before the verdict by the Court of Appeals.
“Just in case”… in case… The Court made an unfavorable verdict.
“Just in case”… On the day of announcement of the verdict in Ireland, in Poland a reportage of “TVN Uwaga” program was aired. Only thing that could change is a comment, depending on the verdict of the Court of Appeals.
“Just in case”…
Did we “open the door to disaster”?
Or maybe we have foreseen, that when there is such media campaign in Ireland against Martha, then nothing good can come out of this?
That there will be no way to talk about any justice?

The websites are a support for currently needed legal actions.
Those legal actions are various, on various stages.
1. Martha’s Case in the Central Court – AT THAT TIME all details regarding Martha’s case were needed – unfortunately, the websites didn’t run.
2. The Court of Appeals – analyzed only the procedural errors of the Central Court (the websites were started on the day of verdict announcement – again too late).
3. Supreme Court – complaint of constitutional nature
4. European Court of Human Rights – violation of human rights

The case can be resubmitted to the Court in Ireland if NEW FACT are to appear, NEW FACTS in the case.

So at the current stage, nobody in Ireland seem to care what really happened.
But the truth is important.
For the family of the deceased.
For plenty of people.
We don’t just want to satisfy curiosity.
The websites will run, and all the details of the tragedy will be published.

Highly recommended

This Thursday at 9:30 p.m. on TVP1 – “Case for the Reporter” – among others about Martha

On this Thursday, November 29, at 9:30 p.m., TVP1 will air “Case for the reporter”.
Program lead by Mrs Elżbieta Jaworowicz.
One of three topics raised in the program will be Martha’s case.

You are welcome to share this information.
You are welcome to watch.
Short coverage about Martha’s case will be presented.
Next there will be a discussion in the group of invited experts.

What effect will this program have?
Will something happen in Martha’s case?
Will someone want to help in positively ending this tragedy after the airing of the program?
Will the program help in fundraising for court battles in Martha’s defence?

On what stage we will be after airing of the program?
Will it be the same as now? And only more people will know about Martha’s case?
What good will come after the program?

If we didn’t try, we certainly wouldn’t know the answers for these questions…

Alongside Martha we wait for airing of the program.
We will inform about effects…